In a previous post I said that I had had an abnormal CT scan 15 years ago but it hadn't been followed up. I have been chasing it but found out the actual scan had been destroyed so tried to get the report.
My doctors have given me the letter that the neuro sent my then GP that just states that an area of abnormality had been found and was reported as an infarct. (just realised it says the mr study, is this the same as an MRI?)
Does anyone know if the radiographers report would be sent to the GP as well or would it just be this letter? Not sure if it's worth taking to the neuro.
It also says its definitely not epilepsy on the strength of one EEG!!! (He was wrong there!)