Well, it’s not my relationship, and perhaps my unwillingness to compromise is why I’ve never been terribly good at them, but personally, I wouldn’t even have offered a compromise about taking something obnoxious I had no faith in - even in the hope I could bin it while he’s not watching. To me, the latter’s worse, because I’d be forced into a deception, instead of just saying: “Look, I’m not taking it, and that’s that!” I hate having to lie, so I’d prefer to be honest, and say: “I’m not doing it”, even at the risk of annoying him.
Somebody will find the answer one day, but the chances of it being an amateur experimenting at home are negligible, in my view.
For a start, how would you ever know if it had worked? We all know MS is a fluctuating and unpredictable disease. So you take the mushroom gunk, and a year down the line, hopefully, you’re doing well. Is that proof of success? No! Because you can’t eliminate the chance (in my opinion, the certainty) you’d have done just as well without the mushroom gunk. That’s why mass trials are done. One person doing well after a year proves nothing, because they might have been someone like me who would still have done well after a year, despite doing nothing - that’s right, NOTHING about it. If all MS cases progressed in the same way, at the same rate, it would be relatively easy to see if something’s working or not. But it isn’t, because you can’t remove the element of chance - the chance that the person would have done well anyway.
Tina
x