Whenever any health professionals say anything that is contrary to the laws of common sense it is absolutely perfectly reasonable to question the advice they are providing. It is your body and you should understand fully the reasons for the decisions that are being made about your treatments.
I repeat, getting an independent 25(OH)D test from a lab such as Birmingham NHS path lab that has a dedicated Vitamin d testing unit may resolve any doubt and show clearly you have attained and are maintaining a 25(OH)D of 125nmol/l and so are obtaining the best anti inflammatory potential from Vitamin D.
There should be absolutely no justification for you not being made aware of your 25(OH)D level or objection to you confirming that following your specialists advice you have achieved optimal safe 25(OH)D status for someone with an inflammatory condition.
Getting 25(OH)D over 100nmol/l enables optimal absorption of calcium from the diet so there should be no further need for calcium from supplements assuming you have adequate calcium sources in your diet (Yoghurt, cheese, milk cream green leafy vegetables, such as broccoli, cabbage and okra, beans tofu nuts bread fish where you eat the bones, such as sardines and pilchards) There are online calculators that add upcalcium intake so you can confirm you are consuming 800mg daily.or use a nutritional database.
In an earlier post I link to the association of excess calcium and cancer, there are other concerns with excess calcium and increased stroke risk. Calcium from food and water is better used than from supplements therefore when people have natural Vitamin D levels they should (providing the diet supplies sufficent) have sufficient without supplement use and more than 600mg/daily calcium from supplements may be counterproductive.
(link removed by admin)