im so so frustrated!!
i had my mri a couple of weeks ago and I was in for an hour and taken out midway for contrast that hadn’t been ordered. I assumed this indicated something needed a closer look. Obviously. So since then my numb hand arm has deteriorated quite significantly. Making lots of things that were already difficult impossible. I’ve also had leg symptoms and ‘sunburned’ skin patches. I have been awaiting an Emg. Which is tnrw. I emailed the consultants secretary two weeks ago saying I was concerned about MS. I said I know he’s said he’d be in touch after the mri and the emg but that I was struggling in such limbo and if there were answers in my mri I’d really like to know as otherwise we were talking at that point knifing nothing for another month.
Ivd had a letter today saying my mri showed no tumors but there was evidence of an old injury. Had I had a head injury? Moo dictation that this was relevant. And that he would write again after getting my emg results. Firstly writing. Can’t he ever discuss with me? If saying no tumour why not address lesions given I’ve expressed my ms concern. Why not say no tumors or lesions? And old injury. How old. A year a decade. Several decades? I have no knowledge of a head injury. I’ve more questions and no real answers
is it possible he’d write and be evasive about lesions. It just seems odd given my expressed concern not to mention the absence of any. . My scan was 3t with contrast so surely not much could get past that? In which case why not reassure me???
and what of the old injury??? What dues that even mean?? Just so frustrating !